Pachelbels Canon
As seen in the Pachelbels Canon – CollegeHumor video, it really is everywhere.
Maybe you have to be a bit of a music geek, but I laughed myself silly over this one…
As seen in the Pachelbels Canon – CollegeHumor video, it really is everywhere.
Maybe you have to be a bit of a music geek, but I laughed myself silly over this one…
The house of the future: complete computer control.
bq. The House of the Future: Complete Computer Control
bq. As Don Sheppard punches his special code into the electronic keypad at the entryway, a monotone computer voice says, “Welcome-home-Don-come-rightin.’ The front door then glides open.
This is from a 1983 issue of Creative Computing. It amuses me that the “House of the Future” articles haven’t changed all that much since then. The technology has improved (“Insteon”:http://www.insteon.net/ by “SmartLabs”:http://www.smartlabsinc.com/ is pretty cool) but it’s still to expensive (and too geeky) for the average home buyer. Because retrofits are so hard (and labour intensive == expensive), this stuff is best installed by the homebuilders, but there’s no demand…
Michaéla came up with a way to compromise on the “first model year” issue with the new car. If we lease instead of purchase, then if it the truck is a lemon we can return it and let dealer worry about it. We’ll take a bit of a loss, but theoretically this is smaller loss than if we tried to sell it ourselves; if it’s a lemon, the resale value will suck.
Because auto loan finance rates are disgustingly low (we’re staring at 2.9%), we do fairly well on the lease vs. buy tradeoff. We’ll pay slightly more in total interest if we buy out the lease, but our payments will be 25% smaller. Since we generally struggle with cash flow (damned tuition fees!), this is a good thing.
I didn’t get a chance to write about tow vehicles before we bought one; oh well :)
We went to the Hamilton RV show last Saturday and crawled around in a bunch of pop-up trailers. The data so far:
* Fleetwood is very expensive. The quality and features are there, but I’m not convinced that they’re worth the price tag.
* We want a 10′ pop-up trailer. 12′ would be nice on rainy days, but they’re freakin’ heavy and much larger than the 2′ difference would lead you to believe; I’d rather have the slightly easier to drive with smaller trailer. On the other hand, 8′ trailers are too small for the four of us, especially as the kids get physically larger.
* Rockwood and JayCo both have nice 10′ models. Palomino (same company as Rockwood) has some nice designs too, but for some reason they’re about 20% heavier than the Rockwoods.
* We decided to go with cargo space in the tow vehicle over a “box” on the trailer. We’d be hauling stuff in and out either way, and this way we have the cargo space without the trailer too.
The Rockwood and Jayco models that we like all weigh in at around 2000 lbs. Manufacturer “tow ratings”:http://www.suvoa.com/towing_matrix.cfm only include a driver, so add 400-500 lbs of passengers and 400-500 lbs of gear. Follow the “75%” rule of trailer/cargo mass vs. tow rating, and that means we’re looking for a vehicle with a 4000 lb (or more) tow rating. Strangely, there aren’t very many of those! There’s a big gap between minivans and small SUVs at 3500 lbs, and full-size SUVs and trucks at 6500 lbs and up.
We also wanted something that can carry our friends, and the kids and their friends, on normal trips (i.e. our regular kite festivals), up to and including carrying two adults and four kids on a camping trip. That ruled out the myriad 5-passenger compact and mid-size SUVs (probably just as well, because selecting from that many options would be challenging).
We also wanted to, at a minimum, _attempt_ to a passing wave at fuel economy, as our lives require two single-passenger vehicles during the week. You can’t really get an eight-passenger, tow-capable truck that isn’t a fuel hog, but we wanted to try…
Michaéla’s extensive research narrowed us down to a couple of the new “CUVs (Crossover Utility Vehicles)”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossover_SUV, which can be described as scaled down minivans or scaled up station wagons. They’re designed like SUVs, but have car-inspired unibody construction so they handle better and are more fuel efficient.
The only one we really liked, that met all of our criteria, was the new “Saturn Outlook XR FWD”:http://saturn.gmcanada.com/ss/english/vehicles/saturn/outlook/outlook_overview.jsp. While I’m very nervous about purchasing a new-model vehicle, Saturn has a reasonably good reputation for quality, particularly after purchase. Most manufacturers seem to be revamping their entire vehicle lineups anyway; there are lots of new-model cars and trucks on the market right now! Besides, it’s a very nice vehicle :-).
The Outlook also comes with all-wheel drive, but everything I’ve read says that AWD either doesn’t help with towing, or actively makes it worse. It makes the vehicle heavier, and it’s one more thing to go wrong. AWD also uses 5-10% more fuel.
Anyway, we’ve ordered one with the options we like; the heated leather seats, the trailering package (of course :), and we splurged and went for the built-in rear-seat DVD player. Everyone I’ve talked to with kids who didn’t buy the DVD option has regretted it. We could get a couple of portable DVD players for similar $$$, but there are advantages to the built-in. We didn’t spring for the “luxury” package (heated mirrors, seat position memory, yadda yadda) or the backup/parking assist (which would primarily tell us that we’re too close to the trailer :-). The “Cold Weather Package” (heated windshield washer fluid, remote start) sounded cool, but we decided not to be frivolous. Ditto the sunroof; I think we use the Maxima’s sunroof a handful of times each year. Finally, we left off the built-in GPS navigation system; we can get equivalent system for 1/4 of the price, which also means we can upgrade if the technology gets better (and move the GPS-nav to the other car when required :-).
It’s supposed to take 6-8 weeks for the vehicle to show up here in Toronto. We still have to choose a colour, though!
I can understand that they wouldn’t want to give a lot of publicity to their fuel economy but I am surprised to find it seems they haven’t put the fuel economy on the site anywhere! What is it? (Dare I ask?)
Did you look at hybrid SUVs or would they be too expensive or otherwise unsuitable?
Heck, I even heard that routine while I was riding on the bus a couple of weeks ago — one of the local radio stations rebroadcast it.
(Wandering through from Out of Ambit)