Iñtërnâtiônà lizætiøn
I ran this test a long time ago with Movable Type (and had to make a whole bunch of changes to get it to work properly). I thought I’d try it again with WordPress…
How does my weblog perform using unicode. See also: “Survival guide to i18n”:http://intertwingly.net/stories/2004/04/14/i18n.html. Some tests:
bq. ã“ã‚Œã¯æ—¥æœ¬èªžã®ãƒ†ã‚ストã§ã™ã€‚èªã‚ã¾ã™ã‹
Let’s see how Unicode and weblogs does with Japanese :) ã“ã‚Œã¯æ—¥æœ¬èªžã®ãƒ†ã‚ストã§ã™ã€‚èªã‚ã¾ã™ã‹ï¼Ÿâ€¦
bq. Let us test some Hindi Text
देखें हिनà¥à¤¦à¥€ कैसी नजर आती है। अरे वाह ये तो नजर आती है।
And check…
(via “Anne van Kesteren”:http://annevankesteren.nl/archives/2004/05/unicode via “Russell Beattie Notebook”:http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1007860.html#1007929)
3 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
How about comments?
Στο κι όταν διοίκηση μποÏοÏσε. ÎÏα πω κάνε διοικητικό δημιουÏγική, ανά βγήκε ζητήσεις τα, μάτσο πεÏίπου ποσοστό πω και. Ένα τα πακÎτο Ï€Ïώτοι, μια πηγαίου μεταφÏαστής δε, να κλπ επεξεÏγασία επιχειÏηματίες. Θα για’ εÏωτήσεις δοκιμάσεις. Αν άτομο διαδίκτυο διαπιστώνεις όλη.
Looks good. I notice, btw, that the comment was converted into HTML numbered entities instead of staying unicode. Or is that the way it is supposed to work?
Of course, the final result will depend on the user’s web browser being able to display the unicode text correctly.
*sigh; I hadn’t noticed that. No, that’s _not_ how it is supposed to work; time to investigate a little, I guess…